What do German Molecular Tumor Boards recommend in patients with PIK3CA mutated tumors? - Launch and first results from the German TEAM-D Transsectoral Molecular Tumor Board exchange platform Deutschland (TEAM-D).

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE: Comprehensive molecular tumor profiling is widely used in the management of patients with cancer. Molecular tumor boards devise treatment strategies based on testing results. In this setting, the Transsectoral Molecular Tumor Board exchange platform Deutschland (TEAM-D) aims to drive peer-to-peer exchange to connect experts in the field. METHODS: During the first virtual TEAM-D meeting, participants from 16 German universities and 5 nonacademic institutions discussed five cases with PIK3CA hotspot mutations. Furthermore, an illustrative case vignette was presented. RESULTS: Overall, German caregivers show restraint in administering off-label PIK3CA inhibitor and favor clinical trials in this setting. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of precision oncology, TEAM-D enables virtual case discussion across the different sectors of the German healthcare system. Based on the example of PIK3CA hotspot mutations, TEAM-D demonstrated the value of integrating knowledge from different healthcare professionals.

Supporting the decision to perform molecular profiling for cancer patients based on routinely collected data through the use of machine learning.

BACKGROUND: Personalized medicine offers targeted therapy options for cancer treatment. However, the decision whether to include a patient into next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing is not standardized. This may result in some patients receiving unnecessary testing while others who could benefit from it are not tested. Typically, patients who have exhausted conventional treatment options are of interest for consideration in molecularly targeted therapy. To assist clinicians in decision-making, we developed a decision support tool using routine data from a precision oncology program. METHODS: We trained a machine learning model on clinical data to determine whether molecular profiling should be performed for a patient. To validate the model, the model's predictions were compared with decisions made by a molecular tumor board (MTB) using multiple patient case vignettes with their characteristics. RESULTS: The prediction model included 440 patients with molecular profiling and 13,587 patients without testing. High area under the curve (AUC) scores indicated the importance of engineered features in deciding on molecular profiling. Patient age, physical condition, tumor type, metastases, and previous therapies were the most important features. During the validation MTB experts made the same decision of recommending a patient for molecular profiling only in 10 out of 15 of their previous cases but there was agreement between the experts and the model in 9 out of 15 cases. CONCLUSION: Based on a historical cohort, our predictive model has the potential to assist clinicians in deciding whether to perform molecular profiling.

Unresectable biliary tract cancer: Current and future systemic therapy.

For decades, treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) was confined to the use of chemotherapy. In recent years however, the number of therapeutic options available for patients with unresectable BTC have drastically increased, with immunotherapy and targeted treatment gradually joining the ranks of guideline-recommended treatment regimens. The aim of the present review is to summarise the current knowledge on unresectable BTC focusing on epidemiology, anatomical distribution and current strategies for systemic treatment. We further outline ongoing clinical trials and provide an outlook on future therapeutic interventions. In the realm of gastrointestinal malignancies, the increasing number of systemic treatment options for BTC is finally delivering on the longstanding commitment to personalised oncology. This emphasises the need for considering a comprehensive genomic-based pathology assessment right from the initial diagnosis to fully leverage the expanding array of therapeutic options that have recently become accessible.

Genetics and beyond: Precision Medicine Real-World Data for Patients with Cervical, Vaginal or Vulvar Cancer in a Tertiary Cancer Center.

Advances in molecular tumor diagnostics have transformed cancer care. However, it remains unclear whether precision oncology has the same impact and transformative nature across all malignancies. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-related gynecologic malignancies who underwent comprehensive molecular profiling and subsequent discussion at the interdisciplinary Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) of the University Hospital, LMU Munich, between 11/2017 and 06/2022. We identified a total cohort of 31 patients diagnosed with cervical (CC), vaginal or vulvar cancer. Twenty-two patients (fraction: 0.71) harbored at least one mutation. Fifteen patients (0.48) had an actionable mutation and fourteen (0.45) received a recommendation for a targeted treatment within the MTB. One CC patient received a biomarker-guided treatment recommended by the MTB and achieved stable disease on the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus for eight months. Factors leading to non-adherence to MTB recommendations in other patient cases included informed patient refusal, rapid deterioration, stable disease, or use of alternative targeted but biomarker-agnostic treatments such as antibody-drug conjugates or checkpoint inhibitors. Despite a remarkable rate of actionable mutations in HPV-related gynecologic malignancies at our institution, immediate implementation of biomarker-guided targeted treatment recommendations remained low, and access to targeted treatment options after MTB discussion remained a major challenge.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer - A systematic review of prospective data.

Purpose: This systematic review aims to comprehensively summarize the current prospective evidence regarding Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in various clinical contexts for pancreatic cancer including its use as neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), induction therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), salvage therapy for isolated local recurrence (ILR), adjuvant therapy after radical resection, and as a palliative treatment. Special attention is given to the application of magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the Medline database via PubMed was conducted focusing on prospective studies published within the past decade. Data were extracted concerning study characteristics, outcome measures, toxicity profiles, SBRT dosage and fractionation regimens, as well as additional systemic therapies. Results and conclusion: 31 studies with in total 1,571 patients were included in this review encompassing 14 studies for LAPC, 9 for neoadjuvant treatment, 2 for adjuvant treatment, 2 for ILR, with an additional 4 studies evaluating MRgRT. In LAPC, SBRT demonstrates encouraging results, characterized by favorable local control rates. Several studies even report conversion to resectable disease with substantial resection rates reaching 39%. The adoption of MRgRT may provide a solution to the challenge to deliver ablative doses while minimizing severe toxicities. In BRPC, select prospective studies combining preoperative ablative-dose SBRT with modern induction systemic therapies have achieved remarkable resection rates of up to 80%. MRgRT also holds potential in this context. Adjuvant SBRT does not appear to confer relevant advantages over chemotherapy. While prospective data for SBRT in ILR and for palliative pain relief are limited, they corroborate positive findings from retrospective studies.

Fusion genes in pancreatic tumors.

Gene fusions and rearrangements play a crucial role in tumor biology. They are rare events typically detected in KRAS wild-type (WT) pancreatic tumors. Their identification can inform clinical management by enabling precision oncology, as fusions involving BRAF, FGFR2, RET, NTRK, NRG1, and ALK represent actionable targets in KRAS-WT cancers, and serve diagnostic purposes since fusions involving PRKACA/B represent the diagnostic hallmark of intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms (IOPNs). Although they are rare, the therapeutic and diagnostic importance of these genomic events should not be underestimated, highlighting the need for quality-ensured molecular diagnostics in the management of cancer. Herein we review the existing literature on the role of fusion genes in pancreatic tumors and their clinical potential as effective biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Interpreting and integrating genomic tests results in clinical cancer care: Overview and practical guidance.

The last decade has seen rapid progress in the use of genomic tests, including gene panels, whole-exome sequencing, and whole-genome sequencing, in research and clinical cancer care. These advances have created expansive opportunities to characterize the molecular attributes of cancer, revealing a subset of cancer-associated aberrations called driver mutations. The identification of these driver mutations can unearth vulnerabilities of cancer cells to targeted therapeutics, which has led to the development and approval of novel diagnostics and personalized interventions in various malignancies. The applications of this modern approach, often referred to as precision oncology or precision cancer medicine, are already becoming a staple in cancer care and will expand exponentially over the coming years. Although genomic tests can lead to better outcomes by informing cancer risk, prognosis, and therapeutic selection, they remain underutilized in routine cancer care. A contributing factor is a lack of understanding of their clinical utility and the difficulty of results interpretation by the broad oncology community. Practical guidelines on how to interpret and integrate genomic information in the clinical setting, addressed to clinicians without expertise in cancer genomics, are currently limited. Building upon the genomic foundations of cancer and the concept of precision oncology, the authors have developed practical guidance to aid the interpretation of genomic test results that help inform clinical decision making for patients with cancer. They also discuss the challenges that prevent the wider implementation of precision oncology.

Three-month life expectancy as inclusion criterion for clinical trials in advanced pancreatic cancer: is it really a valid tool for patient selection?

PURPOSE: To analyze the 3-month life expectancy rate in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients treated within prospective trials from the German AIO study group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pooled analysis was conducted for patients with advanced PC that were treated within five phase II/III studies conducted between 1997 and 2017 (Gem/Cis, Ro96, RC57, ACCEPT, RASH). The primary goal for the current report was to identify the actual 3-month survival rate, a standard inclusion criterion in oncology trials. RESULTS: Overall, 912 patients were included, 83% had metastatic and 17% locally advanced PC; the estimated median overall survival (OS) was 7.1 months. Twenty-one percent of the participants survived < 3 months, with a range from 26% in RC57 to 15% in RASH. Significant predictors for not reaching 3-month OS were > 1 previous treatment line (p < 0.001) and performance status (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the definition of a life expectancy of > 3 months as a standard inclusion criterion in clinical trials for advanced PC, a significant proportion of study patients does not survive > 3 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT00440167 (AIO-PK0104), NCT01729481 (RASH), NCT01728818 (ACCEPT).

[Therapiesteuerung in der Hämatologie und Onkologie].

Die diesjährige Frühjahrstagung der DGHO (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hämatologie und Medizinische Onkologie e. V.) stand unter der Überschrift «Herausforderungen in der Onkologie - personalisierte Therapiesteuerung¼. Über drei Themenkomplexe hinweg wurden aktuelle Möglichkeiten und Perspektiven der Therapiesteuerung in der Onkologie hinsichtlich «Methoden¼, gelungenen «Beispielen¼ sowie der «Umsetzung in der Versorgung¼ diskutiert.

The Oncology Biomarker Discovery framework reveals cetuximab and bevacizumab response patterns in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Precision medicine has revolutionised cancer treatments; however, actionable biomarkers remain scarce. To address this, we develop the Oncology Biomarker Discovery (OncoBird) framework for analysing the molecular and biomarker landscape of randomised controlled clinical trials. OncoBird identifies biomarkers based on single genes or mutually exclusive genetic alterations in isolation or in the context of tumour subtypes, and finally, assesses predictive components by their treatment interactions. Here, we utilise the open-label, randomised phase III trial (FIRE-3, AIO KRK-0306) in metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients, who received either cetuximab or bevacizumab in combination with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). We systematically identify five biomarkers with predictive components, e.g., patients with tumours that carry chr20q amplifications or lack mutually exclusive ERK signalling mutations benefited from cetuximab compared to bevacizumab. In summary, OncoBird characterises the molecular landscape and outlines actionable biomarkers, which generalises to any molecularly characterised randomised controlled trial.

Implementing precision oncology for sarcoma patients: the CCCLMUmolecular tumor board experience.

PURPOSE: Due to poor outcomes and limited treatment options, patients with advanced bone and soft tissue sarcomas (BS/STS) may undergo comprehensive molecular profiling of tumor samples to identify possible therapeutic targets. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of routine molecular profiling in the setting of a dedicated precision oncology program in patients with BS/STS in a German large-volume sarcoma center. METHODS: 92 BS/STS patients who received comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and were subsequently discussed in our molecular tumor board (MTB) between 2016 and 2022 were included. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed, and the clinical impact of NGS-related findings was analyzed. RESULTS: 89.1% of patients had received at least one treatment line before NGS testing. At least one molecular alteration was found in 71 patients (82.6%). The most common alterations were mutations in TP53 (23.3% of patients), followed by PIK3CA and MDM2 mutations (9.3% each). Druggable alterations were identified, and treatment recommended in 32 patients (37.2%). Of those patients with actionable alterations, ten patients (31.2%) received personalized treatment and six patients did benefit from molecular-based therapy in terms of a progression-free survival ratio (PFSr) > 1.3. CONCLUSION: Our single-center experience shows an increasing uptake of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and highlights current challenges of implementing precision oncology in the management of patients with BS/STS. A relevant number of patients were diagnosed with clinically actionable alterations. Our results highlight the potential benefit of NGS in patients with rare cancers and currently limited therapeutic options.

A Retrospective Analysis of Biliary Tract Cancer Patients Presented to the Molecular Tumor Board at the Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: With the rising importance of precision oncology in biliary tract cancer (BTC), the aim of this retrospective single-center analysis was to describe the clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with BTC who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and were discussed in the CCCMunichLMU molecular tumor board (MTB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-center observational study, we included BTC patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), extrahepatic CCA (eCCA), and gallbladder cancer (GB), who had been discussed in the institutional MTB from May 29, 2017, to July 25, 2022. Patients were followed up until 31 January 2023. Data were retrospectively collected by review of medical charts, and MTB recommendation. RESULTS: In total, 153 cases were registered to the MTB with a median follow-up of 15 months. Testing was successful in 81.7% of the patients. CGP detected targetable alterations in 35.3% of our BTC patients (most commonly ARID1A/ERBB2/IDH1/PIK3CA/BRAF-mutations and FGFR2-fusions). Recommendations for molecularly guided therapy were given in 46.4%. Of those, treatment implementation of targeted therapy followed in 19.4%. In patients receiving the recommended treatment, response rate was 57% and median overall survival was 19 months (vs 8 months in the untreated cohort). The progression-free survival ratio of 1.45 suggest a clinical benefit of molecularly guided treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In line with previous work, our series demonstrates feasibility and clinical utility of comprehensive genomic profiling in BTC patients. With the growing number of targeted agents with clinical activity in BTC, CGP should become standard of care in the management of this group of patients.

Case of a Patient With Pancreatic Cancer With Sporadic Microsatellite Instability Associated With a BRAF Fusion Achieving Excellent Response to Immunotherapy.

In this case report, we discuss a case of pancreatic cancer bearing a BRAF fusion, leading to MAPK activation, MLHph, and finally MSI.

How can we deliver on the promise of precision medicine in oncology and beyond? A practical roadmap for action.

Background: Precision medicine (PM) is a form of personalized medicine that recognizes that individuals with the same condition may have different underlying factors and uses molecular information to provide tailored treatments. This approach can improve treatment outcomes and transform lives through favorable risk/benefit ratios, avoidance of ineffective interventions, and possible cost savings, as evidenced in the field of lung cancer and other oncology/therapeutic settings, including cardiac disease, diabetes, and rare diseases. However, the potential benefits of PM have yet to be fully realized. Discussion: There are many barriers to the implementation of PM in clinical practice, including fragmentation of the PM landscape, siloed approaches to address shared challenges, unwarranted variation in availability and access to PM, lack of standardization, and limited understanding of patients' experience and needs throughout the PM pathway. We believe that a diverse, intersectoral multistakeholder collaboration, with three main pillars of activity: generation of data to demonstrate the benefit of PM, education to support informed decision-making, and addressing barriers across the patient pathway, is necessary to reach the shared goal of making PM an accessible and sustainable reality. Besides healthcare providers, researchers, policymakers/regulators/payers, and industry representatives, patients in particular must be equal partners and should be central to the PM approach-from early research through to clinical trials and approval of new treatments-to ensure it represents their entire experience and identifies barriers, solutions, and opportunities at the point of delivery. Conclusion: We propose a practical and iterative roadmap to advance PM and call for all stakeholders across the healthcare system to employ a collaborative, cocreated, patient-centered methodology to close gaps and fully realize the potential of PM.

[Patient access - access to innovations in oncology]. / Patient access ­ Zugang zu Innovationen in der Onkologie.

INNOVATIVE ONCOLOGICAL DIAGNOSTICS AND THERAPIES: Compared to other European countries, Germany has a large number of innovative therapy options for the treatment of patients with cancer. Currently, the main challenge in care is to be able to offer these options at the right time to all patients, regardless of their place of residence and treatment setting, who could benefit from innovative therapies. ACCESS VIA CLINICAL TRIALS, MOLECULAR TUMOR BOARDS: Clinical trials are often the first opportunity for controlled access to oncology innovation. Reducing bureaucratic processes and increasing transparency about currently recruiting trials is imperative to allow more patients early access across sectors. The concept of decentralized clinical trials and (virtual) molecular tumor boards is also appropriate to allow more patients potential trial inclusion. COSTS OF INNOVATIVE ONCOLOGICAL THERAPY: The best possible use of a growing number of innovative and cost-intensive diagnostic and therapeutic options for a wide variety of patient-specific situations requires low-threshold transsectoral exchange, i.e., communication between (certified) oncological competence centers and physicians across the broad spectrum of medical care, who are expected to simultaneously treat the large number of German cancer patients in everyday care and cover the entire range of the increasingly complex oncological therapy landscape. INNOVATIVE THERAPIES: DIFFERENT ACCESS IN THE REGIONS: The overdue implementation of digital options for cross-sector collaboration is an absolute prerequisite for giving patients who live farther away from a competence or study center access to innovations that are not available at their place of residence or treatment. NEW FORMS OF CARE: OPTIMIZED ACCESS TO INNOVATIVE CARE: The development and testing of new forms of care requires the participation of all those responsible for the care process in order to jointly improve structural conditions, create sustainable incentives and provide the necessary capacities. The basis for this is an ongoing, concerted provision of evidence on the care situation, e.g. in the context of statutory cancer registration and clinical registries at oncology centers.

Precision Oncology in Pancreatic Cancer: Experiences and Challenges of the CCCMunichLMU Molecular Tumor Board.

BACKGROUND: In pancreatic cancer, systemic treatment options in addition to chemotherapy remain scarce, and so far only a small proportion of patients benefit from targeted therapies. OBJECTIVE: The patients with pancreatic cancer discussed in the CCCMunichLMU Molecular Tumor Board were reviewed to gain a better real-world understanding of the challenges and chances of precision oncology in this hard-to-treat cancer. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic cancer who received comprehensive genomic profiling and were discussed in the interdisciplinary Molecular Tumor Board between May 2017 and July 2022 were included. These patients' medical charts, comprehensive genomic profiling results, and Molecular Tumor Board recommendations were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: Molecular profiles of 165 patients with pancreatic cancer were discussed in the Molecular Tumor Board. In the 149 cases where comprehensive genomic profiling was successful, KRAS mutations were detected in 87.9%, TP53 in 53.0%, and CDKN2A in 14.1%. 33.3% of KRAS wild-type patients harbored targetable mutations, while these were only found in 19.1% of patients with the KRAS mutation; however, this difference was not statistically significant. 63.8% of patients with successful testing received a targeted treatment recommendation by the Molecular Tumor Board; however, only 3.2% of these were put into practice. Compared to a historic cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer with synchronous metastatic disease diagnosed between 2010 and 2017, the patients from the pancreatic cancer cohort with synchronous metastatic disease had a longer survival. CONCLUSIONS: This single-center experience emphasizes the challenges of targeted treatment in pancreatic cancer. Very few patients ultimately received the recommended therapies, highlighting the need for more and better targeted treatment options in pancreatic cancer, early comprehensive genomic profiling to allow sufficient time to put Molecular Tumor Board recommendations into practice, and close cooperation with clinical trial units to give patients access to otherwise not available targeted treatments.

Serum biomarker panel diagnostics in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the clinical utility of soluble interleukins, IFN-γ, TNF-α and PD-1/PD-L1 in comparison to established serum tumor markers.

PURPOSE: Novel biomarkers to better predict outcome and select the best therapeutic strategy for the individual patient are necessary for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: Using a panel assay, multiple biomarkers (IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, CEA, CA 19-9, CYFRA 21-1, HE4, PD-1 and PD-L1 levels) were measured in serum samples of 162 patients with resected, locally advanced and metastatic PDAC in this retrospective single-center study. Optimal cut-off values to differentiate prognostic subgroups with significantly different overall survival (OS) were determined by receiver operator characteristics and Youden Index analysis. Marker levels were assessed before the start of chemotherapy and correlated with OS by univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. RESULTS: Median OS for resected patients was 28.2 months, for locally advanced patients 17.9 months and for patients with metastatic disease 8.6 months. CYFRA 21-1 and IL-8 discriminated metastatic from locally advanced patients best (AUC 0.85 and AUC 0.81, respectively). In univariate analyses, multiple markers showed prognostic relevance in the various subgroups. However, multivariate Cox models comprised only CYFRA 21-1 in the resected group (HR 1.37, p = 0.015), IL-10 in locally advanced PDAC (HR 10.01, p = 0.014), as well as CYFRA 21-1 and CA 19-9 in metastatic PDAC (p = 0.008 and p = 0.010) as an independent prognostic marker for overall survival. CONCLUSION: IL-10 levels may have independent prognostic value in locally advanced PDAC, whereas CYFRA 21-1 levels are prognostic after PDAC surgery. CYFRA 21-1 and IL-8 have been identified to best discriminate metastatic from locally advanced patients.